Hannibal Necromancer →Used Deck

At level 4, it is possible to put a magic counter on the summon and break the trap card. .

A so-called beaten monster summoned by a rare hunter in the original work on the first turn.
His first appearance as a card was DM3 and his level was 5, and perhaps because he was a Spellcaster at that time, he became a Spellcaster instead of a demon or undead in the OCG.
Although it avoided level 5 when it was converted to OCG, for some reason it was tied to a magic counter because it was a spellcaster, and its effect was a degraded breaker with a slightly higher defensive power.
It's the same with Baphomet, but it's unthinkable nowadays to make a card that's such a minor choice and doesn't even have any interest in it as a card attached to a game strategy book.
Personally, I really like the illustration, and I think the ultra-rare looks good, maybe because the background is a bright green color.

Comprehensive evaluation: 《Breaker the Magical Warrior》is good.
Face-down cards and his spell cards are out of target, and the low ATK is only good enough to deal with 《Sangan》etc.
Even if you use a card that supports them, there doesn't seem to be a chance to use this one.

A prepared version card of a magic warrior who had a certain limit.
His ATK is not increased by counters, and only face-up and Trap cards can be destroyed, making it very difficult to handle.
With a card of this level, I wonder if I can expect it to play a role in making the opponent's removal work like a breaker.

A degradation breaker that even has racial attributes.
If you force it to increase its advantage, its defensive power is slightly higher, but if you use it as a set, it will kill the effect, so it's hard to say it's an advantage.
An effect that doesn't look like a necromancer.

In terms of individual card performance, as other evaluators have said, it is true that it is inferior in terms of versatility, such as not functioning as an attacker against Magic Warrior Breaker and being unable to remove spells, so it is almost never considered necessary. Will. However, it can be said that Hannibal Necromancer's true value lies in the fact that it can be quietly hidden in the majority's opinion that it is unnecessary.
In the past, Continuous Trap was often used as a key card, and locks using Burn and 《Royal Decree》, which were developed from "Gravity Bind - Net of Super Gravity", were especially popular. In this kind of deck, he was more cautious of "Magic Warrior Breaker" than high-level monsters, and there were many players who saved Bottomless Trap Hole for that purpose.
Among them, this 《Hannibal Necromancer》is a card that is particularly unexpected. Immediately after summoning, a counter is placed and the effect can be used immediately. In addition to that, he is a recruiter that doesn't cost Bottomless Trap Hole. With the advantage of being compatible with Dark Eruption, which a breaker doesn't have, if you keep one in your Deck or GY, the chances of breaking through the key cards are greatly increased. .

A card that can be said to be an adjusted version of Magic Warrior Breaker. Attributes, races, etc. are covered splendidly, and in exchange for low ATK, defense is high. Like Mage Fighter Breaker, the effect is activated by removing magic counters, but his face-up Trap card is too limited. It has the advantage of not being affected by 《Bottomless Trap Hole》, but in the current environment where even the Magic Warrior Breaker is not used, there is no way to use it.

In this era, 3 breakers with the same racial attribute and high effect can be put in.
It doesn't seem to be used much anymore.

Nearly backward compatible with Magic Warrior Breaker.
Even at the time when breakers were banned, this is too low performance.

On top of being a degradation breaker, he doesn't look like a spell user no matter how you look at it

The only point that beats "Breaker" is defensive power, but even that is a slightly halfway figure of 1800. The effect is so pinpoint that it can't even be a "Breaker" after the 4th one, so even if the effect is different, you can just use another low-level Spellcaster monster.

A card that appeared after adjusting the Magic Warrior Breaker.
If it's just lowering ATK, it's fine, but the effect is the same as removing the trap... it's too adjusted.
What's more, the Magic Warrior Breaker is an unlimited card...

No matter how you look at it, it's good to be a breaker...
Defender would be fine if you want a solid lower spell use.

A piece of taste called a breaker adjusted according to the appearance time.
In other words, now that the breaker has returned without limit, please understand the value of its existence.
Unlike Breaker, it does not hit the abyss, but since the set card cannot be destroyed, the abyss cannot be destroyed.

There are too few opponents that can be used even as a magic warrior breaker after the 4th card.
Even if you try to use his low ATK as a recruiter etc., it will only respond to summons, so it is extremely difficult to save.

"Breaker"
In addition to the attribute and race, there is no way to defend it if it is inferior in both ATK and versatility...
High defense isn't bad, but if that's the case, you should use a defender...